Skip to content
Saleswoman
Log in

LeadIQ alternative and LeadIQ competitors, with Apollo vs LeadIQ priced for teams that call, email or write

LeadIQ Pro now costs $20 to $290.25 a month for up to five users, so few teams leave over the list price. They leave because phone numbers cost ten credits, because a sixth rep joined, or because the data was never the slow part. Which LeadIQ competitor fits each case, on what each one publishes.

Buying 9 min read

Spam risk Grade words today

Spam signals found: . Footer check: .

One email address, a 6 digit code, then the steps for connecting your sending domain. No card required.

The draft

To (domain redacted)

Claim ledger

of cited

This draft asserts nothing checkable, so there is nothing to cite.

Run it on your own prospect

Four inputs, all prefilled. No signup.

Angle

Daily cap, per mailbox

In the product, Saleswoman also reads the account's public pages and your CRM. In this demo it only has what you pasted, so anything it cannot source here is flagged rather than assumed.

The best LeadIQ alternative depends on why you are leaving. If phone numbers eat your credits, UpLead includes the mobile number in one credit per contact ($99 or $199 a month) and Lusha charges 5 credits a phone instead of LeadIQ's 10. For more than five users, Apollo.io ($49 to $119 a seat billed annually) and RocketReach (from $39) sell per seat. ZoomInfo and Cognism quote only.

LeadIQ is not an expensive tool any more. Its pricing page now sells one pool of Universal Credits with five users included, from $20 a month for 200 credits to $290.25 for 6,750, with 25% off on annual billing. So price alone is rarely the reason to switch, and a list that ranks competitors by headline cost will point most teams the wrong way. The full breakdown, with the cost of an email and a phone number at six credit levels, is on our leadiq pricing page. Every figure below is read off each vendor's own pricing page. Where a vendor prints no figure, neither do we.

What each LeadIQ competitor publishes

Vendor Publishes a price What its own page shows Phone number
LeadIQYesPro $20 to $290.25 a month by credit level, up to 5 users, 25% off annual. Enterprise quoted, annual only10 credits, email 1
UpLeadYesEssentials $99, Plus $199 a month, or $74 and $149 a month billed annually. One user per planIncluded in the 1 credit contact
LushaYesStarter $49.90, Pro $69.90, Premium $399.90 a month, or 25% less billed yearly. 1, 2 or 5 seats5 credits, email 1
RocketReachYesEssentials $39, Pro $79, Ultimate $169 a seat a month, or $229, $619 and $1,379 a yearFrom Pro, inside the export
Apollo.ioYesBasic $49, Professional $79, Organization $119 a seat a month billed annuallyDrawn from the seat's credits
ZoomInfoNoConsumption credits, quoted by team size, features, API access and termQuoted
CognismNoStandard and Pro, five seats included on each, personalised quoteQuoted
SaleswomanYes$149 Solo, $399 Team, $999 Scale month to month, or $74, $199 and $499 a month billed annuallyNo contact data at all

Six of the eight print a figure. Read the last column before the price column. Across the whole category the headline rate matters less than what a phone number costs, and that is where LeadIQ sits at the top of the range.

The four reasons teams look for a LeadIQ alternative

Pick the one that applies before you read a single comparison. They lead to different shortlists.

  • Phone numbers eat the pool. A phone reveal costs 10 credits, so a calling team burns through a plan that looked generous in emails.
  • A sixth rep joined. Pro includes up to five users on every credit level. The next person means a second account or a quoted, annual Enterprise contract.
  • You want sending on the same bill. LeadIQ writes a draft message but lists integrations, not a sequencer, so the email still goes out from a second tool.
  • The data was never the slow part. The accounts were already known, and the week went into research and writing, which no contact database does.

If you are leaving because phone numbers eat the pool

Sales rep on a call with a headset in a bright office

This is the most common trigger, and the arithmetic is simple. On LeadIQ a contact with both an email and a phone number costs 11 credits. At the $50 level with 1,000 credits a month, that covers about 90 complete contacts for the whole team. At the top Pro level, 6,750 credits for $290.25, it covers about 613, or 47 cents each.

UpLead prices the other way. One credit unlocks a contact with the email and the mobile direct dial together, so Plus at $199 a month for 400 credits works out to about 50 cents a complete contact at full use, for one user. Lusha charges 5 credits for a phone, half LeadIQ's rate, and puts two seats on Pro at $69.90 a month with 600 credits, which is about 100 complete contacts. RocketReach includes phone numbers in each export from Pro at $79 a seat. The per contact math for each is on uplead pricing and lusha pricing.

None of these is cheaper than LeadIQ for email. At 4 to 10 cents an email, LeadIQ stays the low price in this group. So the honest move for a mixed team is often two tools, not one: LeadIQ for addresses, and a per contact tool for the reps who dial.

If you are leaving because a sixth rep joined

Five users on one pool is LeadIQ's advantage right up to the sixth hire. Past that, the choices are a second Pro account with its own pool and admin, or Enterprise, which is quoted and annual only.

Apollo.io sells per seat, from $49 a month billed annually on Basic, and each seat carries its own credits, 30,000 a year. RocketReach sells per seat from $39 a month and adds a team plan from $6,000 a year with pooled credits. Lusha Premium is $399.90 a month for five seats, so it hits the same ceiling as LeadIQ Pro at a higher price. Cognism includes five seats on both its packages and quotes them.

The LeadIQ alternatives, one by one

UpLead, if your reps call as much as they email

One credit, one complete contact, with no phone surcharge. Essentials is $99 a month for 170 credits and Plus $199 for 400, or $74 and $149 billed annually. The catch is the other way round from LeadIQ: every self serve plan is a single user, and teams go to Professional, which is annual and quoted.

Lusha, if you want a cheaper phone with a few seats

Lusha's 5 credit phone number is half LeadIQ's rate. Pro includes two seats and Premium five, and unused monthly credits on those plans roll forward up to twice the allowance. Emails cost more than on LeadIQ, at about 9 to 12 cents, so this move pays only for teams that dial.

Apollo.io, if you want data and sending on one bill

Apollo prints Basic at $49, Professional at $79 and Organization at $119 a seat a month on annual billing, with Organization needing three seats. Sequencing is built in, so a team that captures in LeadIQ and sends from a separate engagement tool can drop one subscription. The trade is a bill that grows with headcount and an annual commitment.

RocketReach, if you export in bulk on annual billing

Annual plans give unlimited lookups and cap exports instead: Pro at $619 a year for 3,600 exports with phone numbers is about 17 cents a contact if you use them all. Check how many you really export before you commit. The export caps for each plan are on rocketreach pricing.

ZoomInfo and Cognism, if coverage or intent was the problem

Neither prints a figure. ZoomInfo prices by consumption credits and names team size, credit volume, features such as intent, integrations and contract length as the levers. Cognism names Standard and Pro packages with five seats each and quotes both. They suit a team that needs intent signals and broader coverage and will run a procurement process. What goes into a ZoomInfo quote is on zoominfo pricing.

One narrower case. Teams that used LeadIQ mainly through its API or MCP integration, feeding contacts into their own enrichment waterfall, are not really choosing a new database. They are choosing which API to wire in next, and the faster route is often to hire an AI developer for the integration work than to trial three vendors by hand.

Saleswoman, if the data was never the slow part

This case is more common than the comparison lists admit. The reps already knew the accounts, from the CRM, events or a partner. LeadIQ filled in the email for a few cents, and then someone spent twenty minutes reading the company's site before writing a first message that showed they had looked. A cheaper database does nothing for that twenty minutes.

Saleswoman, which we build, does that reading and writing. It takes an account you already have, reads the prospect's own site and public sources, writes the first touch and the follow ups, and marks every factual sentence as sourced or unverified, holding any it cannot back up. You approve, then it sends within the daily cap you set. It costs a flat $149, $399 or $999 a month month to month, or half that billed annually, with three seats on Team, and syncs with HubSpot and Pipedrive on every plan and Salesforce from Team. It has no contact database, so the natural setup is LeadIQ for addresses and Saleswoman for the messages.

How to switch from LeadIQ in five steps

  1. Export the contacts you captured and any job change lists while the subscription is live, so you do not pay a new vendor for records you already own.
  2. Split last quarter's reveals into emails and phone numbers, per person. That split, not the headline price, decides between LeadIQ's 10 credit phone, Lusha's 5 and UpLead's single credit contact.
  3. Run 50 of your own target accounts through each shortlisted tool and count the complete contacts each returns. A cheaper vendor is worth nothing on a list it cannot match.
  4. If the shortlist includes an annual or quoted contract, read the renewal and cancellation terms before the demo, not after.
  5. If step two showed most reveals went to accounts you already had, trial a writing tool on those same 50 accounts before you buy another database.

When LeadIQ is still the right tool

Stay if your team is five people or fewer and mostly sends email. At 4 to 10 cents an email, with one printed price for all five users, self serve checkout and job change tracking on Pro, nothing else in the table above beats it on all four at once. Leave only the part that is not working: the phone numbers, the sixth seat, or the writing.

What is the best alternative to LeadIQ?

For a calling team, UpLead, because the mobile number comes inside one credit per contact, or Lusha at 5 credits a phone. For more than five users with sending included, Apollo.io from $49 a seat billed annually. For intent data and wide coverage, ZoomInfo or Cognism on a quote. For writing to accounts you already know, an AI SDR such as Saleswoman.

Apollo vs LeadIQ

Apollo vs LeadIQ comes down to whether you need sending in the same tool. Apollo is a database with sequences, priced per seat: Basic $49, Professional $79 and Organization $119 a seat a month billed annually, or $65, $99 and $149 billed monthly, with each seat carrying its own credits. LeadIQ is a capture and enrichment tool with no sending, and its Pro plan prices one shared credit pool for up to five users, from $20 a month for 200 credits.

For five people the gap is wide. Five Apollo Basic seats are $2,940 a year billed annually. LeadIQ Pro at 1,000 credits a month is $50 a month, or $37.50 billed annually, for all five. Phones change the sum: LeadIQ charges 10 credits per phone number, so a team that dials every contact burns that pool ten times faster. If your reps already send from Outreach, Salesloft or HubSpot, LeadIQ is the cheaper capture layer. If they need a sender too, Apollo saves a second contract. The full LeadIQ credit table is on leadiq pricing.

Is Apollo better than LeadIQ?

Apollo suits a team that wants contact data and email sequences in one tool and can commit to annual per seat billing. LeadIQ suits a team of up to five that mostly needs emails and already sends from its own engagement tool, because one shared pool from $20 a month costs far less than five Apollo seats. Test both on 50 of your own accounts.

Is LeadIQ better than ZoomInfo?

For a small team that wants a price without a sales call, LeadIQ is easier to buy: Pro is printed on the page and bought without a sales call. ZoomInfo publishes no figure and quotes each contract, but sells intent data and wider coverage. The right pick depends on whether you need to find new accounts or reach the ones you already have.

More on sales outreach tools

The rest of the writing, on the same three subjects: what to send, what to check before it goes, and what to keep afterwards.

  • Lead Forensics alternatives

    Lead Forensics prices every contract on your website traffic after a one week trial, and Automate is where workflow, lead routing and ABM matching sit. Teams look elsewhere because they want a price before the demo, because they want the person rather than the company, or because identified accounts never got an email worth answering. Which Lead Forensics competitor fits each case, on what each one publishes.

  • Qualified Piper pricing

    Qualified prints no dollar figure for Piper, but it does print what each plan holds: web sessions, active email contacts and agent profiles. What those allowances mean for a US team, the lines a Qualified quote adds up, and when an outbound AI SDR with a public price is the better buy.

  • 6sense competitors

    6sense quotes every contract and sells one Sales Intelligence license with credits, Predictive AI or both. Teams leave because credits expire unused, because they mostly needed to know who visits the website, or because the intent signals never turned into emails anyone answered. Which 6sense competitor fits each case, on what each one publishes.

  • Bombora alternatives

    Bombora sells intent data on a quote and calls itself a data company, not a platform. Teams leave because the weekly surge list never changed what reps did, because they only needed a handful of topics, or because they really wanted to know who was on the website. Which Bombora competitor fits each case, on what each one publishes.

Read the ledger on your own draft.

The demo writes an email from what you paste, then marks every factual sentence as cited or unverified and scores the spam risk. No account, no card.

Run it on a prospect

Your data stays yours. Prospect data is never used to train a model. The demo needs no card and no account.